Portfolio optimization can be defined as reducing risk without sacrificing return. Investors have lots of ways to invest with low risk, but get low returns. That is not optimal. Investing with a chance to gain stock market returns while eliminating most if not all the stock market risk will result in portfolio optimization. This is the investment world’s version of “have your cake and eat it too.” While such a low risk/high return investment may sound unrealistic, it exists. It is called a “Buffer Fund”. These are unique investments that are ideal for investors who might love stocks but hate losing money in a falling market. So, what is this optimal investment and how does it work? With the objective of delivering both the upside of stocks and downside protection, Buffer funds work as a defined-outcome investment. They come with a risk-reducing “buffer” (what you get) and cap, or limit to what it will return (what you give). For most conservative investors, this risk reward trade off is suitable and attractive.
Portfolio Strategies
There are many ways an investor can integrate buffer ETFs into their portfolios. First, because such investments boost stock exposure with less risk they allow an investor with a low risk tolerance and little exposure to stocks to achieve potentially higher returns. For example, an investor who holds 70% bonds and 30% stocks may consider upping their stock allocation to 40% (adding a 10% buffer allocation) and trimming their bond holdings to 60%. Also, buffer ETFs can be a prudent substitute for cash or bonds. Investors who are close to retirement may be looking for more growth via stocks. Shifting a portion of a bond portfolio to a buffer ETF may provide more growth while keeping portfolio risk in check. As noted above, they can be a compelling alternative to Treasuries and other bond instruments. Lastly, buffer ETFs can serve as a stock diversifier. They can add a defensive slice to a stock allocation, where the general goal is to reduce equity declines during down markets.
Perspective on downside risk
While the stock market by its nature is volatile, having proper perspective on downside risk is helpful. Since the primary benefit of buffer ETFs is downside protection and risk reduction, perspective of the stock market’s historical annual returns can help investors avoid “wearing a belt and suspenders”. Choosing a buffer ETF with a 100% buffer may be too conservative and sacrifice greater gains. From 1928 through 2023, the S&P 500 experienced 26 calendar-year losses. Only 3 of those 26 losses was greater than 30%. So, a buffer of more than 30% may be playing it too safe. Here’s the history of the S&P 500’s returns:
Annual Returns for the S&P 500 (includes dividends)
1931 -43.84%
2008 -36.55%
1937 -35.34%
1974 -25.90%
1930 -25.12%
2002 -21.97%
2022 -18.04%
1973 -14.31%
1941 -12.77%
2001 -11.85%
1940 -10.67%
1957 -10.46%
1966 -9.97%
2000 -9.03%
1962 -8.81%
1932 -8.64%
1946 -8.43%
1929 -8.30%
1969 -8.24%
1977 -6.98%
1981 -4.70%
2018 -4.23%
1990 -3.06%
1953 -1.21%
1934 -1.19%
1939 -1.10%
1960 0.34%
1994 1.33%
2015 1.38%
2011 2.10%
1970 3.56%
2005 4.83%
1947 5.20%
2007 5.48%
1948 5.70%
1987 5.81%
1984 6.15%
1978 6.51%
1956 7.44%
1992 7.49%
1993 9.97%
2004 10.74%
1968 10.81%
2016 11.77%
1959 12.06%
1965 12.40%
2014 13.52%
1971 14.22%
2010 14.82%
2006 15.61%
2012 15.89%
1964 16.42%
1988 16.54%
2020 18.02%
1952 18.15%
1949 18.30%
1986 18.49%
1979 18.52%
1972 18.76%
1944 19.03%
1942 19.17%
1982 20.42%
1999 20.89%
2017 21.61%
1983 22.34%
1963 22.61%
1996 22.68%
1951 23.68%
1967 23.80%
1976 23.83%
1943 25.06%
2009 25.94%
2023 26.06%
1961 26.64%
1998 28.34%
2003 28.36%
2021 28.47%
1938 29.28%
1991 30.23%
1950 30.81%
2019 31.21%
1985 31.24%
1989 31.48%
1980 31.74%
1936 31.94%
2013 32.15%
1955 32.60%
1997 33.10%
1945 35.82%
1975 37.00%
1995 37.20%
1958 43.72%
1928 43.81%
1935 46.74%
1933 49.98%
1954 52.56% |